The GambLIB web portal is a project of the International Gambling Research Institute at the School of Advanced Social Studies.

GambLIB is supported by:

HIT logo

+ advanced search

Featured article

Reliability, Validity, and Cut Scores of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) for Chinese

by:
Catherine So-Kum Tang, Joe Tang, Anise M. S. Wu, Elsie C. W. Yan

We examined the reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) when adopted for use in Chinese. The DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling served as the standard against which the classification accuracy of the SOGS was tested. A total of 283 Chinese adults in the community and 94 Chinese treatment-seeking gamblers were recruited. The internal reliability of the SOGS was satisfactory for the general sample and acceptable for the gambling sample. The SOGS was correlated with the DSM-IV criteria items as well as psychosocial and gambling-related problems. Relative to the DSM-IV criteria, the SOGS tended to overestimate the number of pathological gamblers in both samples. In general, we were relatively confident that individuals were not pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 0 and 4 and were pathological gamblers if the SOGS were between 11 and 20. There was about 50–50 chance of being pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 8 and 10. However, the probability of individuals being pathological gamblers was about 0.30 if the SOGS scores were between 5 and 7. We proposed a SOGS cut score of 8 to screen for probable pathological gambling in Chinese societies.

related url
: http://www.springerlink.com/content/p76175237304r43m/full...

Note: This link will take you to an external website. GambLib.org is not responsible for accessibility and content of external websites.

type
: report •
published in
: 2009 •
publisher
: Springer •
is part of a publication
: Journal of Gambling Studies
keywords
: Chinese gambling screen, Chinese SOGS, pathological gambling